Submit Post for December 5 (Source Comparison #5)

Please post a link to your final Source Comparison in the comments.

Submit Post for November 28 (Article Review #5)

Please post a link to your fifth Article Review in the comments.

Submit Post for November 21 (Source Comparison #4)

Please post a link in the comments to your fourth Source Comparison.

Submit Post for November 14 (Article Review #4)

Please add a comment with a link to your fourth Article Review.

Submit Post for November 7 (Source Comparison #3)

Please add a comment to this post with a link to your third Source Comparison.

Submit Post for October 31 (Article Review #3)

Please add a comment with a link to your third Article Review.

Submit Post for October 17 (Source Comparison #2)

Please submit a comment here with a link to your second Source Comparison.

Reading and HW for October 17 Class

Please complete the following reading in Web ReDesign 2.0 before our class on Wednesday, October 17.

Web ReDesign 2.0 by Goto & Cotler
pages 46-85

In addition, I'd like you to answer the following five questions about the reading assignment.

1. What do Goto and Cotler think are some important things to identify when assessing audience capabilities? Are there examples you would add given changes in the industry since the book was published in 2005?
2. What is scope creep?
3. What software application do the authors recommend using for project management? Why do they recommend using a different application to deliver project management information to a client?
4. There's a proofreading error in the sidebar titled "Project Management Applications"—what is it? (Google may help you here.)
5. According to the authors, can usability testing be conducted using an online survey? Why or why not?

You should post the answers to these questions on your blog and submit a link to them in the comments for this blog post by the start of class. Your name and a link to the post will be sufficient here.

Submit Post for October 10 (Article Review #2)

Please add a comment here following the format established for Article Review #1. This should be posted by October 10, although we have a class meeting that night.

Submit Post for October 3 (Source Comparison #1)

Please add a comment to this post with a direct link to your first Source Comparison. Follow the same format used for submitting Article Reviews, but instead of including an article title, use a more general topic description (i.e., what were your three selected articles about?).

Reading for October 3 Class

Please complete the following reading assignments by Wednesday, October 3. 

Web ReDesign 2.0 by Goto & Cotler

pages 16-46

Notes on the Core Web Development Process (a handout)

http://www.capitalistofknowledge.com/adv3560fa12/goto-cotler-notes_fa12.pdf

Lunch with the FT: Tim Berners-Lee

By Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/b022ff6c-f673-11e1-9fff-00144feabdc0.html#axzz27bMiO3Dr

Also, please do a little clicking around Tim Berners-Lee's web personal pages on the W3 site (mentioned in the article above) and be prepared to discuss them:

http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/

Submit Post for September 19 (Article Review #1)

Please add a comment to this post with a direct link to your first Article Review. Include these three elements on separate lines:

1. your first name
2. title of article reviewed
3. direct url for your review (pointing to a post on your blog, NOT to the article you reviewed)

For example, if I added a comment for the sample review that I created it would look like this:

Justin
"The Dirty Little Secrets of Search"
http://webarchitecture-fa12.blogspot.com/p/sample-review-searching-for-trouble_12.html